View Single Post
  #23217  
Old 16-07-2016, 06:33 PM
conquer conquer is offline
Samster
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,285
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
My Reputation: Points: 4827 / Power: 13
conquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond reputeconquer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vedic View Post
This is the reason why I am very choosy over the MLs.
I do not book MLs who share their place and / or if their pictures are blurred.
Additionally I would like to say we must have the strength to turn these MLs down when they are different from the advertised pictures.
Good job to all brothers who do that.
For me, this is a ridiculous way of advertising a girl in commercial sex industry. A costumer merely relies on a telephone number to decide whether they want to spend that 110-dollar. Think about that!!!

I understand this is a precaution taken by the operators and the sex workers to escape from the law enforcement. But I refuse to agree such risk has to be transferred to us (as a costumer) to accept a transaction without having to know how the "product" looks like.

Of course, this is my personal point of view. You might not agree, but that's alright.
__________________
Whores are for fucking not loving. Just fuck them and be done with it.